Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-02-07 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.18 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Blue and Red |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2270 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, with a 97.6 score against 76.1. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Motorola Moto G7 Plus has Android 10, counting with a lot of extra features and some performance improvements. Galaxy Fold's construction is somewhat thinner but extremely heavier than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and both were released only 8 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. Moto G7 Plus and Galaxy Fold count with extremely similar screens, because although the Moto G7 Plus has a little bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2270 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little greater screen density.
Galaxy Fold features a slightly better camera than Moto G7 Plus, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a lot worse 12 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations and a bigger back camera sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much better storage to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G7 Plus, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior battery lifetime than Moto G7 Plus, because it has a 46% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.