Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | -- |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than the Moto G84, having a global score of 97.6 against 80.9. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Moto G84 has Android 13 version. The Moto G84 features a brighter display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little greater pixel count per inch in the screen.
Galaxy Fold has much more memory to install games and applications than Motorola Moto G84, because it has 256 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Fold counts with a lot better performance than Motorola Moto G84. Both have a 12 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Motorola Moto G84 shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video quality and the same video frame rates, the Motorola Moto G84 also counts with a back camera with a lot higher resolution and a much bigger sensor which gives a way better image and video quality.
The Moto G84 has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.