Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-08-28 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is way better than the Moto G9 Play's 76.7 general score. Both phones in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Moto G9 Play has Android 10 version, so it provides you a lot of extra features. Samsung Galaxy Fold's body is thinner than Moto G9 Play, but it is much heavier and was released around 11 months before.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a brighter screen than Moto G9 Play, because it has a much higher 1536 x 2152px resolution, a bit bigger screen and a greater pixels amount per inch in the display. Galaxy Fold features a little bit better performance than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto G9 Play, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory. The Moto G9 Play features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video quality, the Moto G9 Play also counts with a much higher resolution camera and a much larger sensor providing a way higher image quality.
Moto G9 Play features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.