Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-09-07 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is way better than the Moto G9 Plus's global score of 80.5. The Samsung Galaxy Fold body is noticeably thinner than Moto G9 Plus, but it is heavier and was released just a bit over a year before. These phones use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto G9 Plus has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit more powerful processing unit than Moto G9 Plus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM. Moto G9 Plus counts with a screen that's just as good as Samsung Galaxy Fold's screen, because although the Moto G9 Plus has a bit smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater display density.
Galaxy Fold counts with much more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Moto G9 Plus, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Moto G9 Plus counts with a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14 percent larger battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G9 Plus counts with a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting images or videos in poorly lited environments and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto G9 Plus also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor which offers a much higher image and video quality and a back camera with a much better 64 mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.