Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than the Moto G9 Power, with a general score of 97.6 against 78.6. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Moto G9 Power has Android 10, giving a couple additional features and better performance. The Samsung Galaxy Fold body is much thinner than Moto G9 Power, but it's heavier and was released around a year before.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a sharper display than Motorola Moto G9 Power, because it has a quite larger screen, a much higher 1536 x 2152 resolution and a higher display pixel density. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little faster processing unit than Moto G9 Power, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM.
Moto G9 Power takes a little bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Moto G9 Power also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Moto G9 Power, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Motorola Moto G9 Power features a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity against 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.