Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Metal |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is a lot better than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 score. Galaxy Fold is a much newer and just a bit thinner cellphone than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it's heavier. The Galaxy Fold has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a higher number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better pixels count in each inch in the display. The Galaxy Fold captures just a bit better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a way lower resolution camera and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture for better low-light images and video.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Galaxy Fold has better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 25 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.