Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is way better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a general score of 97.6 against 77.4. The Galaxy Fold design is newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's, although it's thicker and notably heavier. Galaxy Fold features a little bit better processing power than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a quite better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution. The Galaxy Fold counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a back facing camera with a 12 megapixels resolution and the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy Fold also has a way bigger aperture for better photography in low-light situations, a bigger back-facing camera sensor and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Galaxy Fold features a much greater storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a superior battery duration than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
The Galaxy Fold costs a lot more money than Moto Z2 Force Edition, but it's still a great choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.