Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2017-06-29 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than Moto Z2 Play, getting a 97.6 score against 77.4. Although the Samsung Galaxy Fold is much newer than Moto Z2 Play, it is somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. Motorola Moto Z2 Play counts with a display that is just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although the Motorola Moto Z2 Play has a really smaller screen and a way worse 1080 x 1920 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy Fold features a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a lot bigger memory to store more games and applications than Moto Z2 Play, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Fold features a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 4380mAh battery size against 3000mAh. The Samsung Galaxy Fold captures a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have a back camera with a 12 mega pixels and the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images in low-light situations and faster video frame rate.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z2 Play. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.