Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is way better than the Motorola Moto Z3, getting a overall score of 97.6 against 77.6. Galaxy Fold is a extremely heavier phone than Motorola Moto Z3, but both of them are equally thin. These devices include the same Android 9.0 Pie OS. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Moto Z3 features a little sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160, it also counts with a bit better pixel number in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same resolution camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has better video frame rate, a bigger camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs and a way bigger camera aperture.
Galaxy Fold counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Moto Z3, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a really longer battery performance than Moto Z3, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Moto Z3. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Moto Z3, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.