Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than Moto Z3 Play, having a 97.6 score against 76.3. Samsung Galaxy Fold's body has the same thickness than the Moto Z3 Play, but it's notably heavier. Moto Z3 Play has a screen that's very similar to the Galaxy Fold one, because although the Moto Z3 Play has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2160 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels number per screen inch.
Galaxy Fold has just a bit better processing power than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy Fold counts with a little bit better camera than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a same resolution back camera, the same video quality and a same size camera sensor, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger camera aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments and higher 60 fps video frame rate.
Galaxy Fold features a much better storage capacity to install games and applications than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy Fold features a superior battery duration than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
The Galaxy Fold costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.