Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Oxford blue |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than Motorola One 5G, with a general score of 97.6 against 84.6. The Samsung Galaxy Fold is an older and incredibly heavier phone than Motorola One 5G, but Samsung managed to make it noticeably thinner anyway. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola One 5G, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM.
Motorola One 5G counts with a little bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher amount of pixels per inch in the display. The Motorola One 5G features a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures or video in low-light environments and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One 5G also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution and a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality.
The Galaxy Fold has a quite bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola One 5G, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola One 5G has just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One 5G. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola One 5G, resigning some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.