Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is better than the Motorola One 5G Ace's 81.6 general score. Although Galaxy Fold is older and notably heavier than the Motorola One 5G Ace, it's design is still way thinner. Galaxy Fold has just a bit better performance than Motorola One 5G Ace, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Fold and Motorola One 5G Ace feature incredibly similar displays, because although the Motorola One 5G Ace has a quite lower 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater amount of pixels in each display inch. Motorola One 5G Ace shoots a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola One 5G Ace also counts with a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels.
Galaxy Fold features a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage. Motorola One 5G Ace features just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 14% greater battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola One 5G Ace, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One 5G Ace. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, else you can save some money and get the Motorola One 5G Ace, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.