Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is much better than Motorola One Action's 78.5 general score. Even though the Galaxy Fold and the Motorola One Action were released with only a couple months difference, the Galaxy Fold construction is notably thinner but way heavier than the Motorola One Action.
Motorola One Action counts with a bit better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2520 resolution and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better display pixel density. Galaxy Fold counts with a bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola One Action, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy Fold features a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola One Action, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Fold features better battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Fold captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same resolution camera, the Galaxy Fold also has faster 60 fps video frame rate and a larger aperture to take better low light captures.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Action. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola One Action, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.