Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is way better than the Motorola One Hyper, having a 97.6 score against 79.8. Even though Galaxy Fold and Motorola One Hyper were released with only a few months difference, the Galaxy Fold design is extremely heavier but incredibly thinner than Motorola One Hyper. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11 version.
The Galaxy Fold features just a little better processing power than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Motorola One Hyper features a display that is very similar to the Galaxy Fold one, because although the Motorola One Hyper has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
Motorola One Hyper shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot tinier aperture which is not nice for taking images and video in low-light environments and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera.
Galaxy Fold features a greater memory for applications and games than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy Fold has a bit superior battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 10% more battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Hyper. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Fold, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola One Hyper, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.