Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Blue and Brown |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Motorola One Vision, with a general score of 97.6 against 80.7. Samsung Galaxy Fold's construction is thinner but heavier than the Motorola One Vision, and both of them were released only 5 months apart. Motorola One Vision has a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller display and a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2520 pixels, it also counts with a little greater display density.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. Motorola One Vision counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a lot larger sensor and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola One Vision, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The Galaxy Fold counts with greater battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.