Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is better than Motorola razr (2020), with a global score of 97.6 against 87. Although Galaxy Fold is older and noticeably heavier than Motorola razr (2020), it's design is still somewhat thinner. These devices work with Android OS, but Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola razr (2020) has Android 11.
Galaxy Fold has a bit faster CPU than Motorola razr (2020), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has a little lower display pixel density, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1536 x 2152px and a larger display.
The Galaxy Fold has much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola razr (2020), because it has more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Fold counts with a much longer battery duration than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4380mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower video frame rates and a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting pictures and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
The Galaxy Fold costs a lot more than the Motorola razr (2020), but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.