Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | -- |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | -- |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 362 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is a lot better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having a global score of 97.6 against 79.2. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15. The Galaxy Fold counts with a very superior processing unit than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has less RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy Fold counts with an incredibly better display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), because it has a little bit bigger display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has as much memory to store more apps and games as Samsung Galaxy Fold, they have the same internal storage capacity. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 7 percent greater battery capacity.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a superior camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for taking photos in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot better 50 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.