Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is a lot better than Nokia 9 PureView's general score of 76.4. The Galaxy Fold design is somewhat thinner but notably heavier than Nokia 9 PureView, and both of them were released only a couple of months apart. Galaxy Fold has just a bit better performance than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM.
Nokia 9 PureView counts with a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px and a better pixel amount in each inch of display. Galaxy Fold has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Fold captures clearer pictures and videos than Nokia 9 PureView, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Galaxy Fold also has a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality, faster video frame rate and a larger aperture.
The Galaxy Fold features better battery life than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 3320mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold costs a lot more than the Nokia 9 PureView, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.