Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than Nokia XR20's 80.8 score. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Nokia XR20 has Android 11 version, counting with some nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy Fold's body is a little lighter and a lot thinner than the Nokia XR20, although it was released a bit more further than a year before.
The Galaxy Fold features a little better performance than Nokia XR20, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. The Nokia XR20 counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2400, it also counts with a bit greater count of pixels in each inch in the screen.
The Galaxy Fold features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Nokia XR20, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. The Nokia XR20 has a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 6% more battery capacity.
Nokia XR20 takes clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a higher image quality and a way better resolution camera in the back.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Nokia XR20, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Nokia XR20. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy the Nokia XR20, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.