Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Cyber shade |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S, having a 97.6 score against 75.8. Both phones we are comparing come with the same Android 9.0 Pie OS. The Samsung Galaxy Fold body is a lot thinner but a lot heavier than nubia Red Magic 3S, and both of them were only released 1 months apart.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Fold. Both have 12 GB of RAM and a Octa-Core processor. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little smaller display, it also counts with a just a little higher screen pixels density.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a much bigger storage to install games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Nubia Red Magic 3S shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for capturing images and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a way larger camera sensor shooting much better quality photographs and videos, a lot more MP back facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a bit better battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4380mAh.
Galaxy Fold is a lot more expensive than nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.