Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's score of 77.7. Both phones in our current comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10, counting with a couple additional features and performance optimizations. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold and OPPO Find X2 Neo were only released 8 months apart, the Samsung Galaxy Fold design is way heavier but just a bit thinner than OPPO Find X2 Neo.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Fold features a bit more powerful processor than OPPO Find X2 Neo. Both of them have a 12 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a superior camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing photos and video in poorly lited environments and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality photographs and a back-facing camera with way more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has just a bit better battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 4380mAh battery size against 4025mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.