Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Ocean |
| -- | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, having a general score of 97.6 against 83.1. These devices have Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10. Even though the Galaxy Fold and the OPPO Find X2 Pro were only released 8 months apart, the Galaxy Fold body is noticeably thinner but also heavier.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 pixels and a greater display pixels density. The OPPO Find X2 Pro and Galaxy Fold have very similar memory capacity for applications and games, both of them have exactly the same internal storage.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a processor that is very similar to the processing unit in Galaxy Fold, they have a Octa-Core processing unit and 12 GB of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a way larger camera sensor and a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution camera.
Galaxy Fold has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than OPPO Find X2 Pro, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 4260mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.