Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, having a general score of 97.6 against 77.4. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is older and notably heavier than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, it's design is still thinner. These phones use Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has Android 14.
Galaxy A15 5G features a little sharper screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little better screen density. The Galaxy Fold has a greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A15 5G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has just a little bit longer battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A15 5G features a slightly better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video and slower video frame rate, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A15 5G, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A15 5G. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy the Galaxy Fold, else you can save some money and get the Galaxy A15 5G, giving up some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.