Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-07-02 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 2.90 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 274 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio G80 MT6769T (12 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is way better than Samsung Galaxy A22, with a 97.6 score against 76.1. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy A22 has Android 12 version, giving a lot of extra features and performance optimizations. Although the Galaxy Fold is older and way heavier than Samsung Galaxy A22, it's body is still somewhat thinner.
The Galaxy Fold features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A22, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Fold features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A22, because it has a lot higher resolution of 1536 x 2152, a better display pixel density and a little bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A22, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory. Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better camera than Galaxy A22, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger aperture.
Galaxy Fold features a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A22.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.