Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G's 84.6 overall score. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Fold is older and a lot heavier than the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, it's design is still noticeably thinner. Both of these phones include Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has Android 11.
Galaxy Fold counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy A22 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Fold also has 8 GB more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a bit greater pixel count per inch in the screen.
Galaxy A22 5G captures clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not good for shooting images and/or video in low-light environments and slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a camera with way more MP.
The Galaxy Fold has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.