Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is much better than Galaxy A25 5G's general score of 79.9. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version, so it counts with some nice extra features. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is somewhat thinner than Galaxy A25 5G, but it is heavier and was released 4 years before.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much better performing processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller display and a little bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a little better pixels count in each inch in the display.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G shoots slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse 30 frames per second video frame rate, a tinier sensor shooting worse quality videos and photographs and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a better storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit longer battery life than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4380mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.