Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, having a global score of 97.6 against 79.4. Samsung Galaxy Fold is a much older and extremely heavier device than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, but Samsung could make it somewhat thinner anyway. Both of these devices have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14 version, giving a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller screen and a bit worse 1080 x 2340px resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel quantity per inch of display. The Galaxy Fold features a superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A35 5G, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a really superior performance than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy A35 5G counts with just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4380mAh.
The Galaxy A35 5G has a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not good for low-light photography and video, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor and a much higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.