Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is better than Galaxy A50s's score of 86.6. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A50s has Android 10. Although Galaxy Fold and the Galaxy A50s were released with only 1 months difference, the Galaxy Fold construction is a little thinner but also much heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy A50s features a little bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution and a bit smaller display, it also counts with a little better quantity of pixels in each inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy A50s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy A50s has a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller aperture and worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also counts with a way higher resolution back camera and a much bigger sensor. Galaxy Fold features much more storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Fold features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 10 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.