Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A52's global score of 90.7. The Galaxy Fold is an older and extremely heavier phone than Samsung Galaxy A52, but Samsung managed to make it thinner anyway. Galaxy Fold has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy A52, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A52 counts with a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little better display density. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a quite bigger memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Galaxy A52 features a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing photos in poorly lited environments and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.