Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | -- |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a little bit better than Galaxy A52 5G, having a 97.6 score against 91.3. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A52 5G has Android 12 version, so it provides some nice extra features. Even though Samsung Galaxy Fold is older and incredibly heavier than Galaxy A52 5G, it's construction is still somewhat thinner.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy Fold has more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy Fold has a little better processing power than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 3 percent larger battery size. The Galaxy A52 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has worse video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much larger sensor shooting much better quality photographs and a back camera with much more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.