Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| -- | Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is much better than Samsung Galaxy A6, with a overall score of 97.6 against 75.8. Galaxy Fold's body is newer and just a bit thinner than the Samsung Galaxy A6's, but it is also a lot heavier. Galaxy Fold has a superior hardware performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Fold also has 9 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy Fold features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a little bit higher pixels density, a much better resolution of 1536 x 2152 pixels and a really larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy Fold captures slightly better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A6, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger sensor providing a better image quality, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a larger aperture.
Galaxy Fold has a way bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A6, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Fold has a much longer battery life than Galaxy A6, because it has a 46 percent bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy A6. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.