Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-04-26 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.47 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Blue, Pink and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 3.52 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is way better than the Galaxy A70's score of 76.9. The Galaxy Fold construction is somewhat thinner but heavier than the Galaxy A70, and they were only released with a few months difference. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy A70 has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy A70 and Galaxy Fold have similar screens, because although the Samsung Galaxy A70 has a little smaller screen and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a bit greater screen density. Galaxy Fold features just a little better processing power than Galaxy A70, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Fold captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy A70, and although they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy Fold also has a bigger diafragm aperture, a bigger sensor which provides a higher photo and video quality and better video frame rate. Galaxy Fold has a much bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A70, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy A70 counts with a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy A70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Galaxy A70. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Galaxy A70, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.