Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is much better than Samsung Galaxy F62, having a 97.6 score against 88.1. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has the newer 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy F62 has Android 11 version, providing some additional features. Although the Samsung Galaxy Fold is older and noticeably heavier than the Samsung Galaxy F62, it's design is still a lot thinner.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy F62, because it has a larger amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater count of pixels per inch of screen.
Galaxy Fold features a better memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy F62, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal storage. Galaxy F62 features a better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video and lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy F62 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with a lot better resolution.
Galaxy F62 features a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 7000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.