Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2019-09-27 | 2017-06-20 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than the Galaxy J7 Max, getting a general score of 97.6 against 76.1. Galaxy Fold's construction is noticeably newer and thinner, but a lot heavier than Galaxy J7 Max. Both devices in our current comparison include Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Galaxy J7 Max and Samsung Galaxy Fold both have very similar displays, because although the Galaxy J7 Max has a really smaller display and a much lower resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixel number in each inch of screen. The Galaxy Fold has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy Fold has much more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a 33% bigger battery size.
The Galaxy Fold shoots much clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a lesser megapixels camera, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a larger aperture to take better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.