Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 362 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is better than the Galaxy M51, having a general score of 97.6 against 87.7. Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is older and extremely heavier than the Galaxy M51, it's construction is still notably thinner. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy M51 has Android 10, providing some extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has just a bit better performance than Galaxy M51, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy M51 and Galaxy Fold both have really similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy M51 has a bit smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little higher quantity of pixels per inch of display.
Galaxy M51 takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy M51 also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution and a way larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy M51, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.