Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note 20's general score of 90.8. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Fold is older and much heavier than the Galaxy Note 20, it's construction is still somewhat thinner. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400px, it also counts with a little bit better screen density.
Galaxy Note 20's processor is just as good as the processing unit in Galaxy Fold, and although the Galaxy Note 20 has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light captures, and they both have a camera in the back with a 12 mega pixels, the Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor which offers a way better image and video quality and a much higher video definition.
Galaxy Fold has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 20, because it has more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 2% more battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Galaxy Note 20, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy Note 20. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Galaxy Note 20, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.