Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note10's general score of 89. Galaxy Fold's body is noticeably heavier but thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Note10, and they were released with only a couple of months difference. The Galaxy Fold has just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has 4 GB more RAM.
The Galaxy Note10 has a bit better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite higher display density. The Galaxy Fold and the Samsung Galaxy Note10 both count with very similar cameras, both of them have the same resolution back-facing camera, a F1.5 aperture, a same size back camera sensor, the same 60 frames per second video frame rates and the same video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much greater storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because it has 256 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Fold counts with better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has a 25% bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy Note10, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy Note10. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy the Galaxy Note10, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.