Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2013-09-25 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Pink and White |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is way better than Galaxy Note3, with a 97.6 score against 77.7. Although the Galaxy Fold is a lot heavier than the Galaxy Note3, it's somewhat thinner and also extremely newer. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2, so it offers a couple additional features and enhanced performance.
The Galaxy Fold features a bit better screen than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little bit lower display pixel density, it also counts with a higher 1536 x 2152 pixels resolution and a bigger display. The Galaxy Fold features just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note3, because it has more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Fold takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a worse video quality and a back camera with a worse 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a way larger diafragm aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a bigger camera sensor providing a better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a way bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. Galaxy Fold counts with a really longer battery performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.