Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 80.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2015-08-21 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl |
| -- | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is way better than the Samsung Galaxy Note5's 80.2 global score. Although the Samsung Galaxy Fold is extremely heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note5, it's a little bit thinner and also newer. The Galaxy Note5 counts with a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Fold features much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note5, because it has 448 GB more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Fold counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Galaxy Fold shoots clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a lower video quality and a way lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a much bigger camera aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments and a bigger sensor shooting higher quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.