Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2016-08-02 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy Note7's 79.5 global score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Fold is way heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note7, it's somewhat thinner and newer. The Galaxy Note7 has a slightly better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a higher amount of RAM memory and more CPU cores. Galaxy Fold has a much bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note7, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Galaxy Fold counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy Note7, because it has a 4380mAh battery size. Galaxy Fold captures just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor which offers a lower photo and video quality, and they both have the same video quality and a 12 mega pixels resolution camera, the Galaxy Fold also counts with a larger aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments and higher 60 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.