Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than the Galaxy S10, getting a score of 97.6 against 88.3. Even though Galaxy Fold and Galaxy S10 were released only a couple months apart, Galaxy Fold's construction is thinner but extremely heavier. These phones work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy S10 has Android 11, so it provides you some extra features.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a much better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a lot greater pixel count per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Galaxy S10's camera is just as good as the Galaxy Fold one, both have a same resolution back facing camera, the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a same size back camera sensor and a F1.5 diafragm aperture. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 4380mAh battery size against 3400mAh.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy S10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S10. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy S10, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.