Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is better than the Samsung Galaxy S10e's general score of 86.3. Even though the Samsung Galaxy Fold and Samsung Galaxy S10e were released only 7 months apart, Samsung Galaxy Fold's body is way heavier but thinner than Samsung Galaxy S10e. The Galaxy Fold features a little bit better performance than Galaxy S10e, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10e features a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit greater pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10e, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory.
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much better battery performance than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 4380mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S10e counts with a camera that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy Fold one, both of them have the same back camera sensor size, a 12 mega-pixels resolution back camera, a same size diafragm aperture, the same (4K) video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy S10e, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy S10e. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save some dollars and buy the Galaxy S10e, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.