Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-27 | -- |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 9.74 ounces | -- |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is better than Galaxy S25's 82.6 general score. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy S25 has Android 14, so it gives you some nice extra features and increased performance. The Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater performance than Galaxy S25, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S25 has a much better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a quite smaller display, it also counts with a quite better pixels density. The Galaxy Fold has a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S25, because it has more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S25, because it has a 4380mAh battery size. Galaxy S25 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor, a lot more megapixels back facing camera and a lot better video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is a lot more expensive than Galaxy S25, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.