Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-27 | -- |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 9.74 ounces | -- |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | -- |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Titanium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 14.74 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is slightly better than Galaxy S25 Ultra, with a score of 97.6 against 90.7. These devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy S25 Ultra has Android 14 version. Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra features a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and more pixels per inch in the display.
The Galaxy Fold has a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S25 Ultra, because it has more internal memory. Galaxy Fold features a really superior processing power than Galaxy S25 Ultra. Both of them have 8 cores and 12 GB of RAM memory. The Galaxy S25 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and a back camera with way more mega pixels.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.