Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 4.4.2 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2014-06-23 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.67 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Blue and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 299.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 432 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 MSM8974-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 2 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | SIM |
| 10.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2800mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 390 hours standby time 21 hours talk time |
| 6.24 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is way better than Galaxy S5 Sport's general score of 77.8. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Galaxy S5 Sport has Android 4.4.2 version. The Galaxy Fold design is notably newer and notably thinner, but noticeably heavier than the Galaxy S5 Sport.
Galaxy S5 Sport counts with a sharper display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller display and a way lower 1920 x 1080px resolution, it also counts with a little bit better pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with 10 GB more RAM and 4 more cpu cores.
The Galaxy Fold takes slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a lot larger diafragm aperture and a bigger sensor. The Galaxy Fold features much more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S5 Sport, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy Fold has a much better battery life than Galaxy S5 Sport, because it has a 4380mAh battery size instead of 2800mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy S5 Sport, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Galaxy S5 Sport. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Fold, else you can save some money and buy the Galaxy S5 Sport, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.