Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a general score of 97.6, which is much better than the Galaxy S7's 79.5 global score. Samsung Galaxy Fold's body is notably newer and somewhat thinner than the Galaxy S7's, but it is noticeably heavier. The Galaxy S7 has a much better display than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a way higher display density and a quite better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold features a superior memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 480 GB more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy S7, because it has 4 more CPU cores and a greater amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S7, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor offering a lower image quality, and they both have a camera with a 12 megapixels and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Samsung Galaxy Fold also counts with better video frame rates and a larger camera aperture to take better images and videos in low-light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S7, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Samsung Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Samsung Galaxy S7. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy S7, giving up a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.