Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-09-27 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than Galaxy S7 Active, with a score of 97.6 against 75.8. The Galaxy Fold construction is extremely newer and thinner than Galaxy S7 Active's, but it's also heavier. Galaxy Fold counts with a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a higher number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S7 Active features a much better screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a much greater pixel density. The Galaxy Fold has much more memory to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 4380mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy Fold captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and although they both have the same video quality and the same resolution camera, the Galaxy Fold also has faster 60 fps video frame rates and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light images.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.