Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 362 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a 97.6 score against 80.1. Both devices in this comparison review have Android operating system, but the Galaxy Fold has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy Fold design is just a little heavier but way thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and they were released with only a couple months difference.
Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher display pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
The Galaxy Fold has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a 12 mega-pixels back facing camera, a F1.5 aperture and the same sensor size, the Galaxy Fold also has a much better video quality. Samsung Galaxy Fold has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 3% more battery size.
Galaxy Fold is a lot more expensive than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it's still a good choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.