Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-02-14 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| -- | Aluminum |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold has a score of 97.6, which is better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's 88.5 score. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has Android 12 version, providing you a couple additional features. Galaxy Fold's body is heavier but a little thinner than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, and both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
The Galaxy Z Flip has a little bit better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2636px, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per display inch. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip's processor is very similar to Samsung Galaxy Fold's processing unit, and although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a camera that's very similar to the camera in Galaxy Fold, and although the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the same video frame rate, a 12 mega-pixels back-facing camera and a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy Fold counts with a much greater storage to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 256 GB more internal memory. Galaxy Fold counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip, because it has 4380mAh of battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold is way more expensive than the Galaxy Z Flip, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.