Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's 85.6 score. Samsung Galaxy Fold's design has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, but it's heavier. These phones have Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 has Android 11 version, so it provides the user some nice extra features and optimized performance.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit lower 1080 x 2636 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel amount in each display inch. The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has more internal memory.
Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Fold also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Fold counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Z Flip 3, and although they both have a 12 MP resolution back camera, the Galaxy Fold also has a bigger diafragm aperture.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with longer battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has a 4380mAh battery size.
Galaxy Fold is way more expensive than Galaxy Z Flip 3, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.